Latest News

HMRC wins Rangers ‘big tax case’ ruling

Added on 23 July 2017 - 7:10 'Viewed 39 views times.
Image copyright Getty Images

Analysis by Chris McLaughlin, BBC Sport

There will undoubtedly be calls for the football authorities to act following this judgement.

A Scottish Premier League investigation headed by Lord Nimmo Smith found Rangers guilty of not registering players properly and the company was fined in 2013.

Nimmo Smith’s judgement was made at a time when the EBT scheme was deemed acceptable by a tax tribunal and he resisted calls for the club to be stripped of honours won during the years the scheme was in operation, saying “Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL Rules.”

It’s unlikely the football authorities will have much appetite to sanction another investigation but that won’t stop some calling for just that.

A spokesman said the Scottish Premier Football League will “take time to examine the ‎judgement in detail and to consider any implications.”

What does the ruling mean?

The result is a major victory for HMRC in its attempts to recoup tax from thousands of other companies which ran EBTs and similar schemes, which were the subject of a crackdown in legislation enacted in December 2010.

HMRC could now issue “follower notices”, which would demand payment from companies who ran similar schemes.

‘Discretionary bonuses’

A number of football clubs in England fall into this category.

A settlement opportunity in light of the 2010 legislation ran out in July 2015 and other firms could now be liable for major sums.

In a written judgment, the judges said: “The sums paid to the trustee of the Principal Trust for a footballer constituted the footballer’s earnings. The risk that the trustee might not set up a sub-trust or give a loan of the sub-trust funds to the footballer does not alter the nature of the payments made to the trustee of the Principal Trust.

“The discretionary bonuses made available to RFC’s employees through the same trust mechanisms also fall within the tax charge as these were given in respect of the employee’s work.

“Payment to the Principal Trust should have been subject to deduction of income tax under the PAYE regulations.”

Image copyright SNS (Scotland) Image caption Sir David Murray took control of Rangers in 1988 and sold the club in 2011

The EBT scheme was administered by the Murray Group, then majority shareholder of the Glasgow club, from 2001 to 2009.

In February 2012, Rangers, which was then run by Craig Whyte, went into administration over a separate tax debt and the tax authority rejected a creditors agreement in June of that year.

The supreme court decision is in relation to Murray Group companies, including the liquidated company RFC 2012, and not the current owners at Ibrox.

The result will mean the creditors of RFC 2012 will receive less money from the pot collected by liquidators BDO, as HMRC will now be owed more money.

‘Creditor dismay’

Former Rangers chairman Sir David Murray said he was “hugely disappointed” with the verdict, which he said ran counter to the legal advice which was consistently provided to Rangers Football Club.

He said: “It should be emphasised that there have been no allegations made by HMRC or any of the courts that the club was involved in tax evasion, which is a criminal offence.

“The decision will be greeted with dismay by the ordinary creditors of the club, many of which are small businesses, who will now receive a much lower distribution in the liquidation of the club, which occurred during the ownership of Craig Whyte, than may otherwise have been the case.”

In a statement, HMRC said: “This decision has wide-ranging implications for other avoidance cases and we encourage anyone who has tried to avoid tax on their earnings to now agree with us the tax owed.

“HMRC will always challenge contrived arrangements that try to deliver tax advantages never intended by parliament.”

Rangers liquidators BDO said it believed taking the case to the Supreme Court had been the correct course of action “given the significance of the matter”.

It said: “We will now engage with HMRC on adjudicating its claim.

“Further advice and guidance will be provided to creditors in due course.”

The Scottish FA said that, after examining the judgement, it would take no further disciplinary action.

It said it had been advised it was unlikely the Scottish FA would be successful pursuing a complaint about whether disciplinary rules could have been breached.

It added that, even if successful, any sanctions available to a judicial panel would be limited in their scope.

Meanwhile, Celtic said they were sure that the football authorities would review their findings that Rangers gained no sporting advantage from the tax-avoidance scheme.

A league commission fined Rangers in 2013 but did not strip the club of any titles they had won during the years the scheme was in operation.

Celtic disagreed with that ruling at the time, and said the Supreme Court judgement “re-affirms that view.”

Comment the Message.

No Comment

You must be logged in to post comments..

Might interest you

Jacoby Ellsbury is now primarily a $153 million pinch runner

With Clint Frazier starting over Jacoby Ellsbury against Cincinnati right-hander Luis Castillo on Tuesday, manager Joe Girardi left no doubt that Ellsbury is now the Yankees ’ fourth outfielder. “There ’s going to be days he ’s going to start and I told him I ’d let him know and prepare him for those days,” Girardi said before the Yankees ’ 4-2 win over the Reds in The Bronx. “I ’ll use him off the bench [to] pinch run. … Right now he has the role of the fourth outfielder, but he ’s gonna play.” That ’s hardly a vote of confidence for someone in the middle of a seven-year, $153 million deal, but Ellsbury ’s lack of production since returning from a concussion, as well as the emergence of Frazier, helped force Girardi ’s hand. Ellsbury called the conversation with Girardi “brief.” …

Premier League kicks on to record revenues of £3.6bn

Image copyright Getty Images Buoyant Uefa TV income helped Premier League clubs' revenues rise 9% to a record £3.6bn in the 2015-16 season, according to analysis from Deloitte.It says broadcast earnings of £1.9bn accounted for more than half of the top flight clubs' total revenues.A new domestic TV deal which kicked in last year means overall revenues continue to grow strongly, it added. For a third straight season, clubs' combined operating profits exceeded £500m, but wages rose 12% to £2.3bn."Even in the final year of its old broadcast contracts, Premier League revenues continued to set new records," said Dan Jones, partner in Deloitte's sports business group, which has unveiled its latest Annual Review of Football Finance. Image copyright Getty Images Total European football market revenues reached 25bn eu…

Why are Spanish football stars in legal trouble?

Image copyright Getty Images Image caption All three players: (L-R) Ronaldo, Neymar and Messi Spain has attracted arguably the three brightest lights of world football, with Cristiano Ronaldo of Real Madrid and Barcelona's Lionel Messi and Neymar all plying their skills in La Liga.Over the past year, football fans have become used to seeing the trio caught up in accusations of tax fraud and other financial crimes by the Spanish courts. And they are not the only players in the crosshairs of the Spanish judiciary. In 2016, Lionel Messi's Argentina and Barcelona team-mate, Javier Mascherano, received a one-year suspended prison sentence for tax fraud.Three players, three trialsLionel Messi and father Jorge were last year convicted of defrauding the Spanish state of €4.1m (£3.6m; $4.6m) in unpaid taxes on the strik…

Tottenham Hotspur not for sale, says Premier League club

Image copyright Getty Images North London Premier League football club Tottenham Hotspur has said that it is not in any discussions relating to a takeover offer.Media reports had said US firm Iconiq Capital was preparing an offer.Spurs are currently in the process of building a new stadium, and will play games at Wembley Stadium next season.The club agreed stadium funding with a trio of banks in May. It says other proposals emerged then, "including bank debt and equity investment".The banks involved in the stadium financing were Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Ltd, Goldman Sachs Bank USA and HSBC bank. The club said in a statement: "The board believes this [stadium financing agreement] was the optimum solution in the interests of fans, employees and shareholders and for the continued development of t…